VPS Location Rating stuck at "Fair", what will make it "Good"?

Technical Support
1

How can we achieve a “good” rating for a VPS location? All of our submitted public locations have a Fair rating, despite contributing dozens of scans across half a year.

The locations are:

  1. “Station 1: Fluss und Aue” 47.939758999999995, 12.937441
  2. “Station 2 - Fluss und Mensch” 47.944782, 12.936496
  3. “Station 3: Schifferleben” 47.944782, 12.936496
  4. “Station 4: Nocken und Stromschnellen” 47.944399, 12.934992999999999
  5. “Station 5: Plätten und Salzhandel” 47.942125, 12.93393
  6. “Station 6: Stadt und Hochwasser” 47.941522, 12.935594
1 Like
2

Hi support team, this issue persists. See above, please.

3

Hi support team, this issue persists. See above, please.

4

Hi! The VPS rating isn’t the best to determine the ability to localize. The way it calculates the rating is quite complex and goes beyond number of scans / coverage of the area. It also takes in account number of repeated features, the complexity of the geometry, etc. I’d also recommend reaching out on the Scaniverse forums if you want to learn more.

1 Like
5

This topic was automatically closed 4 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.